On Wednesday 19 November 2008 06:37:52 pm comex wrote:
> Proto-proto:
> The initiator of a CFJ is generally the person who initiated
> it. However, the CotC CAN create an inquiry case by announcement
> identifying any person as its initiator, as well as a subclass and
> all parameters general
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Proto (AI=2?)
>
>The CotC CAN declare a potential CFJ statement as Malformed by
>an announcement specifying eir reasons for doing so. E SHOULD
>only do so if the construction or means of calling the potential
>
Goethe wrote:
> The CotC CAN declare a potential CFJ statement as Malformed by
> an announcement specifying eir reasons for doing so. E SHOULD
> only do so if the construction or means of calling the potential
> CFJ created substantial uncertainty as to its status as a CFJ.
>
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> I'm so disappointed that I won't get to vote for you as CotC later
>> today. Demanding that a CFJ with no statement is accepted is exactly
>> the sort of attitude we all want in a CotC.
>
> Actually, I did accept it. On further reflection:
Proto (AI=2?)
Wooble wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Murphy, if you reject this as ambiguous I will eat your soul because my
>> intent
>> is clear.
>
> I'm so disappointed that I won't get to vote for you as CotC later
> today. Demanding that a CFJ with
Wooble wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Actually, I did accept it. On further reflection:
>
> I nominate Zefram as CotC.
I can understand your disagreements with my performance of the office,
but could you at least nominate someone active?
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I nominate Murphy as CotC so he can have a few days while I write
> a superior interface and demonstrate my amazing speed of assignment.
Fails, e is already a consenting nominee in the current nomination period.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Murphy, if you reject this as ambiguous I will eat your soul because my
> intent
> is clear.
I'm so disappointed that I won't get to vote for you as CotC later
today. Demanding that a CFJ with no statement is accepted is
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Murphy, if you reject this as ambiguous I will eat your soul because my
> intent
> is clear.
Ineffective because the subject line of a message has no effect on
actions in it. I don't know why you can't just call the CFJ n
9 matches
Mail list logo
