It says "the number of other types of ribbons", which for sure means 5
different unique ribbons
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:59 AM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-business wrote:
> On 6/14/20 1:39 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> > RESOLUTION OF PROPOSALS 8409-8430
> > =
On 6/14/2020 11:59 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On 6/14/20 1:39 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
>> RESOLUTION OF PROPOSALS 8409-8430
>> =
>
> I earn a Red Ribbon for Proposal 8422. I award myself Orange Glitter for
> Proposal 8422. I earn
Did not know that. Very handy!
On 6/11/2020 6:53 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
On 6/11/20 5:41 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
Can I gripe for a sec? Bottom-posting generally does help readability
but can we maybe try to not quote entire 100+ line messages to add one
comment
On 6/11/20 5:41 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
> Can I gripe for a sec? Bottom-posting generally does help readability
> but can we maybe try to not quote entire 100+ line messages to add one
> comment at the bottom? At this point it's more of a nuisance that I am
> required to use m
On 2020-06-11 16:17, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 6:07 AM Rebecca via agora-official
wrote:
=Metareport=
This is the ADoP’s weekly report, which I deputise for ADoP to publish,
having intended to do so more than 2 days earlier (and t
Transparent Ribbons really are the best Ribbons - well done.
On Wed, 2 May 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> I claim a Green Ribbon for Regkeepor. I claim an Orange Ribbon for
> Proposal 8041. I have, within the last 7 days, qualified for a
> Platinum Ribbon for being speaker. I have, within the last
> On May 21, 2017, at 12:44 AM, Nic Evans wrote:
>
> I read the rule as having two mechanisms: 1 where you qualify by virtue of
> never having it, and therefore being able to award it, 2 where anyone can
> award it to anyone regardless of qualificaiton if they haven't before. Owen
> appears t
On Sun, 2017-05-21 at 04:39 +, Quazie wrote:
> You are not ANOTHER person, you can't award yourself a white ribbon.
There have always been two ways to get a White Ribbon:
a) be a new player;
b) persuade a new player to give you a (one-time) White Ribbon award.
There's nothing suspicious abou
Earlier in the rule it says "While a person qualifies for a type of
Ribbon, any player can generally award em that type of Ribbon." Nothing
says the mechanism specified by the White Ribbon is the only mechanism,
and they're not contradictory mechanisms.
In either case I still qualify for it, s
How does 'Can award another person' possibly mean 'can award emself'?
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:43 PM Nic Evans wrote:
> I read the rule as having two mechanisms: 1 where you qualify by virtue of
> never having it, and therefore being able to award it, 2 where anyone can
> award it to anyone reg
I read the rule as having two mechanisms: 1 where you qualify by virtue
of never having it, and therefore being able to award it, 2 where anyone
can award it to anyone regardless of qualificaiton if they haven't
before. Owen appears to have awarded emself a White ribbon previously:
https://www.
You can re-award yourself a Cyan though and still go transparent.
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:39 PM Quazie wrote:
> You are not ANOTHER person, you can't award yourself a white ribbon.
>
> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:38 PM Nic Evans wrote:
>
>> I have held the office of Assessor for >30 days, and i
You are not ANOTHER person, you can't award yourself a white ribbon.
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:38 PM Nic Evans wrote:
> I have held the office of Assessor for >30 days, and in that time have
> never missed a deadline. I award myself the Green Ribbon.
>
> I assigned a judgment to CFJ 3499 [1] wit
I think I interpreted the rule differently. Can you cite precedent?
I’m happy to accede without a formal CFJ - it doesn’t change any of the other
ribbons, and it’s fairly clear that the intention is that players award one
another white ribbons.
-o
> On May 10, 2017, at 2:09 AM, Quazie wrote:
You can't award yourself a white ribbon - you aren't another person.
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 09:07 Owen Jacobson wrote:
> I award myself a red ribbon. No idea how I missed that one.
>
> -o
>
> > On May 10, 2017, at 2:04 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> >
> > I award myself an orange ribbon.
> >
> > I
On Sat, 2014-10-11 at 17:09 +0200, James Beirne wrote:
> > White (W): A player qualifies for a White Ribbon if e has never
> > previously owned a White Ribbon (including under previous rulesets). A
> > player who has been registered for at least 30 days and has never caused
> > another person to g
> While a person owns all types of Ribbon, that person can Raise a Banner
> by announcement. This causes that person to win the game and a new game
> begins. That person's Ribbon Ownership becomes the empty set.
> ...
> White (W): A player qualifies for a White Ribbon if e has never
> previously ow
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 7:26 PM, woggle wrote:
> I hereby award myself a Blue ribbon (CFJ 3326) and a Green ribbon (Horton).
>
> - woggle
>
>
The latter is INEFFECTIVE as you violated the time limit for your May 5
Rulekeepor report.
-scshunt
On Jan 17, 2008 10:49 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not reduce the threshold instead?
Because Ribbons are (currently) boring.
First, they use the same language from VCs. With VCs, there were
common VC gains that had to be paid attention to (you need to keep
submitting good propos
comex wrote:
Ribbons can only be used to win. You can only have one of each kind.
They cannot be transferred or spent on anything else, and are
therefore otherwise useless.A Renaissance victor would have to do
*all* of the following (in addition to other stuff) each time e
attempted to win:
On Thursday 17 January 2008 20:26:22 comex wrote:
> Ribbons can only be used to win. You can only have one of each kind.
> They cannot be transferred or spent on anything else, and are
> therefore otherwise useless.A Renaissance victor would have to do
> *all* of the following (in addition to
On 1/17/08, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Therefore, Ribbons are pointless and I submit the following proposal
> (Power=2) titled "Repeal Ribbons":
> {{
> Repeal Rule 2126.
> }}
Yay!
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unkn
22 matches
Mail list logo
