Ed Murphy wrote:
c. wrote:
I close this NoV. I play Absolv-o-Matic indicating myself as many
times as I have rests.
I'm interpreting this as
"(I play Absolv-o-Matic indicating myself) as many times..."
rather than
"I play Absolv-o-Matic indicating (myself as many times..."
as only a moro
c. wrote:
> I close this NoV. I play Absolv-o-Matic indicating myself as many
> times as I have rests.
I'm interpreting this as
"(I play Absolv-o-Matic indicating myself) as many times..."
rather than
"I play Absolv-o-Matic indicating (myself as many times..."
as only a moron in a hurry woul
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:52 AM, comex wrote:
>> That's not very nice-- e clearly was unaware of the situation.
>
> I don't think it's unreasonable to expect officers to read the rules.
Officers can be replaced or deputised for, so failur
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:52 AM, comex wrote:
>> That's not very nice-- e clearly was unaware of the situation.
>
> I don't think it's unreasonable to expect officers to read the rules.
> Of course, if e was unaware because the SLR wasn't defining "pu
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 19:19 -0800, Charles Schaefer wrote:
> 2009/1/13, Geoffrey Spear :
> I publish an NoV alleging H. Notary w1n5t0n violated R2143 by
> failing
> to publish the Notary's monthly report in December.
>
> I contest this. The Notary wiki page contains the t
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:52 AM, comex wrote:
> That's not very nice-- e clearly was unaware of the situation.
I don't think it's unreasonable to expect officers to read the rules.
Of course, if e was unaware because the SLR wasn't defining "publish"
at the time that's probably grounds for NOT G
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> I contest this. The Notary wiki page contains the text and parties of all
>> current contracts, as required of my monthly report. I don't believe it is
>> necessary for me to send it to the mailing list.
>
> Agora is not B. Reports must b
Wooble wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> I contest this. The office of Historian was repealed by Proposal 6018
>> on December 22.
>
> Does the fact that the portion of the IADoP's report listing you as
> holding the office the last time I published it mean the office
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I contest this. The office of Historian was repealed by Proposal 6018
> on December 22.
Does the fact that the portion of the IADoP's report listing you as
holding the office the last time I published it mean the office still
exists? Either wa
9 matches
Mail list logo
