Well, anyway, good thing is to know that the power system works for protecting
votes - proposal would have failed if it had the AI to affect voting strength
:).
On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> I support. Besides the phrasing issues, I agree that voting strength was too
> harsh. I wr
nttpf
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> I support. Besides the phrasing issues, I agree that voting strength was too
> harsh. I wrote this proposal as a silly thing as I was thinking about the
> potential implications of CB’s proposal. Voting strength was the first debuff
I support. Besides the phrasing issues, I agree that voting strength was too
harsh. I wrote this proposal as a silly thing as I was thinking about the
potential implications of CB’s proposal. Voting strength was the first debuff I
could think of, as well as a very simple one to implement. This w
3 matches
Mail list logo
