El 13/02/2020 a las 17:56, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion escribió:
sukil wrote:
Me too!
Hi sukil, welcome to Agora! You sent this to the main Discussion Forum
(agora-discussion@agoranomic.org), whereas you probably meant to send it
to the main Public Forum (agora-busin...@agoranomic.
sukil wrote:
> Me too!
Hi sukil, welcome to Agora! You sent this to the main Discussion Forum
(agora-discussion@agoranomic.org), whereas you probably meant to send it
to the main Public Forum (agora-busin...@agoranomic.org). Messages sent
to a discussion forum have no in-game effect, because it's
El 13/02/2020 a las 17:37, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business escribió:
Aris wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 5:09 AM Jason Cobb via agora-business
wrote:
Happy birthday! I grant Falsifian 3 coins.
Likewise!
So do I!
-tw
Me too!
In terms of the common definition for "declare", it makes perfect sense.
In fact I called a CFJ on a similar issue (substituting "state" for
"declare") a couple weeks back, but I'm realizing it's not in the Gazette.
D. Margaux, did the following CFJ get missed or am I just not finding the
assi
Thanks, G.
When I was initially planning this, I thought I remembered Rule 478
being power=4 and having some strong wording to the effect that
players can participate in the fora, and thought I could make a case
that a lower-powered rule like 2125 can't limit a player's ability to
do anything syno
You adopted the reasons, but arguably not the judgement. Could you say that
you judge it FALSE, just in case?
-Aris
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 3:54 PM D. Margaux wrote:
>
> I adopt the below reasons as my final judgment In this CFJ.
>
> I earn 5 coins and award myself 3 PLA favours for issuing the
Welcome, Falsifian! Good test of new rule - nice beginning!
In general, when a rule says "a Player CAN [verb] with Agoran Consent", it
means that e does whatever [verb] is using the Agoran Consent method; that
is, the "actual" actions the player takes are following the R1728 procedure.
Similar
Thanks, D. Margaux. The only thing I can think of is that "declaring"
might not be an action (and hence not covered by Rule 1728), or that
it might be synonymous with "announcing" or "publishing", which Rule
478 allows me to do. I'm guessing that Rule 217 and game custom
defeat those arguments, bu
8 matches
Mail list logo
