On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> I register, with nickname 'Bede'.
>
> I award myself a White Ribbon.
>
> - Bede
>
Welcome, Bede! I dance the dance of welcome.
OscarMeyr
On Dec 3, 2007 10:19 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> comex wrote:
> >I couldn't imagine using a text-mode browser as my standard one.
> >What's the point...?
>
> They're much more user-friendly than graphical browsers. I've never
> found a graphical browser that I was comfortable about usi
comex wrote:
>I couldn't imagine using a text-mode browser as my standard one.
>What's the point...?
They're much more user-friendly than graphical browsers. I've never
found a graphical browser that I was comfortable about using.
Fundamentally, graphical browsers are evil and rude because they
On Dec 3, 2007 9:59 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I couldn't imagine using a text-mode browser as my standard one.
> What's the point...?
I normally use Firefox. Links is quite useful in terminals, though.
-root
On 12/3/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ah, that would explain it. Regrettably no one is attempting to implement
> > Javascript in Lynx.
>
> One of the reasons that I use Links instead.
>
> -root
I couldn't imagine using a text-mode browser as my standard one.
What's the point...?
On Dec 3, 2007 8:12 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> comex wrote:
> >Although it is unfortunate that the select box requires Javascript,
>
> Ah, that would explain it. Regrettably no one is attempting to implement
> Javascript in Lynx.
One of the reasons that I use Links instead.
-root
On Dec 3, 2007 5:27 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a poor reference for the pseudo-CFJ. That link shows the
> *current* state of the AC rules, rather than the ruleset that was in
> effect at the time of the CFJ. (Curiously, there's a form on that page
> with a select box that app
comex wrote:
>Although it is unfortunate that the select box requires Javascript,
Ah, that would explain it. Regrettably no one is attempting to implement
Javascript in Lynx.
-zefram
On 12/3/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (Curiously, there's a form on that page
> with a select box that appears to offer a choice between versions of the
> ruleset, but as the form has no submit button it's impossible to use by
> standard means.)
Although it is unfortunate that the select
Josiah Worcester wrote:
>True, it is a poor reference. I note, though, that there are no rules stating
>that the submitter of a CFJ need to be a player *or* a person. Feel free to
>correct me, though.
Rule 591:
An inquiry case CAN be initiated by any
person, b
On Monday 03 December 2007 05:27:28 Zefram wrote:
> Josiah Worcester wrote:
> >Agora's Child CFJs on the following: Agora's Child is a player and a
> >partnership.
>
> Per the arguments given, I believe Agora's Child was not a person at the
> time of this message, so it could not initiate a CFJ.
On Sunday 02 December 2007 16:06:40 Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2007 4:00 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The AFO CFJs on the following: The AFO is a player and a partnership.
> > Arguments against: The AFO's contract sates that its members *may* act on
> > behalf of the AFO to
On Dec 2, 2007 4:00 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The AFO CFJs on the following: The AFO is a player and a partnership.
> Arguments against: The AFO's contract sates that its members *may* act on
> behalf of the AFO to satisfy its obligations, not that they must. By rule
> 2145,
13 matches
Mail list logo
