comex wrote:
>I couldn't imagine using a text-mode browser as my standard one.
>What's the point...?

They're much more user-friendly than graphical browsers.  I've never
found a graphical browser that I was comfortable about using.

Fundamentally, graphical browsers are evil and rude because they do
what the website tells them to do, rather than what I want them to do.
They have lots of magic behaviour that makes them unpredictable.
They don't play nicely.  And they all use the kind of GUI exemplified
by Windows, which I've always found painful to operate.

Then there's the documentation.  This is an issue that particularly,
but not exclusively, arises with graphical programs, which often try
to do their own sui generis interactive help system instead of a plain
old man page.  I've found that in such browsers (e.g., Firefox) the help
system is no help whatsoever, because it merely parrots what is already
apparent from the interface, rather than explaining deep concepts or
giving useful advice.  I suspect that this is no coincidence: I suspect
that the program's authors are themselves confused, have failed to instill
the program with any deep concepts, and are not sufficiently serious
engineers to see the value in documentation.  I generally avoid using
such poor programs, and so am not often subjected to the correspondingly
poor documentation.

I don't have much call for graphical stuff anyway.  Right now, a fairly
typical state, my work environment consists of an X server on a 2560x1024
display (two monitors side by side), twm, and eighteen xterms.  No other
X clients running.  Many times a day I'll want to view an image from a
website, in which case lynx happily fires off xloadimage; I like that
this happens only for the images that I actually want to look at, rather
than for tens of useless images per web page.  When I really need to do
Javascript, which is almost exclusively for viewing the company's website
(which I'm indirectly implementing), I'll start Firefox.  So, generally,
almost everything I do is text based, and I prefer to view text in a
specialist tool (xterm) than in something that's mainly concerned with
a GUI.

People these days forget what the "T" in "HTML" stands for.

-zefram

Reply via email to