===
= = OFFICIAL IMPERIAL STATEMENT = =
===
I will not perform any actions that would unfairly benefit BlogNomic
players coming from an Agoran invasion.
However, if it is decided that one of us should take over BlogNomic and
decl
On Sun, 2019-02-17 at 14:12 -0800, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> What if both nomics passed (matching) minigames themed around “combat
> with the other nomic”? We could write in rules to give the winning
> nomic dictatorship over the losing one, or just do it for bragging
> rights.
Both BlogNomic and Ago
What if both nomics passed (matching) minigames themed around “combat with the
other nomic”? We could write in rules to give the winning nomic dictatorship
over the losing one, or just do it for bragging rights.
Whatever the theme, I am very much in favor of inter-nomic interaction.
Gaelan
> O
On Sun, 2019-02-17 at 11:27 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> So we did this before. I think ais523 led it, but several of us registered
> and tried to drive a win, with the intent that the next dynasty be an Agoran
> one. (nothing more invasive, but we called it an invasion for fun).
Assuming this wa
So we did this before. I think ais523 led it, but several of us registered
and tried to drive a win, with the intent that the next dynasty be an Agoran
one. (nothing more invasive, but we called it an invasion for fun).
It really pissed everyone off over there. They united against us and we
OK I overlooked the “more seriously (...)” lmao. Sorry for getting so
heated up.
Yeah, having Ambassadors again would be cool. Aside from BN there are two
active Discord nomics right now, Infinite Nomic (on the which I made a win
happen after months of play on the same day I joined, I’m pretty pro
Trigon might want to but any late thematic changes now to their dynasty
would heavily rely on the current players to pass, and I suspect that a
sudden Agora takeover would be met with more snickering than we can deal
with and would fail.
There’s a lot more social power and percieved legitimacy in
Trigon is the current Emperor of BlogNomic, so depending on how corruptible e
is we may have an in...
More seriously, the office of "Ambassador" (to other nomics) that apparently
used to be a thing is mildly interesting:
https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg06285.html
It would’ve been pretty easy to win last dynasty with a coordinated team
(wealth was pretty unambiguous from the start in the form of Clues:
Emperor-given info on a series of data a la Cluedo; wealth could be easy
shared because you just needed to know it. Unsurprisingly, a team of two
players won.
Consider me interested.
Gaelan
> On Feb 16, 2019, at 10:33 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> We could just win it in the normal way next time and declare an Agora
> theme...
>
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 at 01:32, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
>
>> My reading justifies the Agoran invasion better.
>>
>> Greeting
We could just win it in the normal way next time and declare an Agora
theme...
On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 at 01:32, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> My reading justifies the Agoran invasion better.
>
> Greetings,
> Ørjan.
>
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2019, Aris Merchant wrote:
>
> > I rather hoped the “mutatis mutandis”
My reading justifies the Agoran invasion better.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Sat, 16 Feb 2019, Aris Merchant wrote:
I rather hoped the “mutatis mutandis” was implied.
-Aris
On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 4:27 PM Ørjan Johansen wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019, Aris Merchant wrote:
BlogNomic almost actually
I rather hoped the “mutatis mutandis” was implied.
-Aris
On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 4:27 PM Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2019, Aris Merchant wrote:
>
> > BlogNomic almost actually passed something like that once. We sent
> someone
> > over to caution them that such an unfortunate plan wo
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019, Aris Merchant wrote:
BlogNomic almost actually passed something like that once. We sent someone
over to caution them that such an unfortunate plan would result in an
Agoran invasion (okay, ais actually did it sua sponte, but my version
sounds better).
Wait, BlogNomic legis
On 2/16/2019 9:52 AM, James Cook wrote:
On the one hand, I am inclined to vote against it --- will it
encourage people to be selective about which rules they follow?
What's interesting to me about this is that it's a collective decision -
as long as one person follows it, everyone is followi
On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 at 17:04, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Ok, hopefully last time!
>
> I withdraw the proposal Ritual Sacrifice from the pool.
>
> I submit the following proposal, Ritual Sacrifice, AI-1:
>
>
> Create a Rule entitled
This rather takes away from the elegance of a single rule.
Here's a "simple" option:
Repeal threshold: N Agoran Consent, where N is the maximum of 1 and
10/(A+1) rounded up to the nearest 0.1, and A is the number of weeks the
rule has been continuously appeased.
(Sequence: 10, 5, 3.4, 2.5,
BlogNomic almost actually passed something like that once. We sent someone
over to caution them that such an unfortunate plan would result in an
Agoran invasion (okay, ais actually did it sua sponte, but my version
sounds better).
-Aris
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 2:56 PM Madeline wrote:
> Obviousl
Sounds cool but it’s not destructive enough. It should blow up ourselves
too and all avocados IRL.
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 at 23:52, Madeline wrote:
> "If this Rule's power exceeds 4.0, then all other rules notwithstanding,
> Agora is destroyed."
> (Would any other rule need to actually change for s
Obviously, I'm just talking in hypotheticals.
On 2019-02-16 09:55, Aris Merchant wrote:
No one is doing anything that has any meaningful chance of destroying
Agora. If there’s a bug in your mechanism, the stakes go from it being
broken to the game dying permanently.
-Aris
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019
No one is doing anything that has any meaningful chance of destroying
Agora. If there’s a bug in your mechanism, the stakes go from it being
broken to the game dying permanently.
-Aris
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 2:52 PM Madeline wrote:
> "If this Rule's power exceeds 4.0, then all other rules notw
"If this Rule's power exceeds 4.0, then all other rules notwithstanding,
Agora is destroyed."
(Would any other rule need to actually change for such a clause to work
if an outside Power 3 rule is adjusting its power?)
On 2019-02-16 09:47, D. Margaux wrote:
Love it.
You could have a separate p
Love it.
You could have a separate power 3 rule that (1) changes the power of the Ritual
rule and (2) causes itself to be repealed when the Ritual rule is repealed.
And I’d love to see the power of the Ritual rule increase, too, if the Rule is
left unappeased... and maybe increase at a higher
Actually I've been pondering something even fancier, like every time
it's appeased it decreases in Power and the Power is linked to the
Consent required. Or something. (of course you can't increase power
in the same way).
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 2:08 PM D. Margaux wrote:
>
> Any chance we can h
Any chance we can have it repeal with Agoran Consent or something more than
notice? Or is that excessive? :-)
> On Feb 15, 2019, at 3:41 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> Actually, one more time. Empty sacrifices are meaningless.
>
> I withdraw my proposal, The Ritual.
>
> I submit the following p
PRAISE THE RITUAL
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 9:33 PM D. Margaux wrote:
> I hope the Ritual becomes an actual ritual, and is never repealed. It
> seems kind of awesome.
>
> > On Feb 15, 2019, at 3:11 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > I withdraw the proposal I recently submitted, quoted below.
> >
> >
I hope the Ritual becomes an actual ritual, and is never repealed. It seems
kind of awesome.
> On Feb 15, 2019, at 3:11 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> I withdraw the proposal I recently submitted, quoted below.
>
> I submit the following Proposal, The Ritual, AI-1:
> -
27 matches
Mail list logo
