On Thu, 2 Oct 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I think it should be evaluated at the time of resolution, to ensure
> that e.g. "6001: FOR if 6000 passed" works. (Gets messy if the
> resolution of 6000 is accidentally invalid, but I can't think of a
> good way around that. If the resolution of 6000 is de
On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 12:27 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I think it should be evaluated at the time of resolution, to ensure
> that e.g. "6001: FOR if 6000 passed" works. (Gets messy if the
> resolution of 6000 is accidentally invalid, but I can't think of a
> good way around that. If the resolution
Goethe wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Oct 2008, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> from adequate information that (a) is clearly identified in the
>> voting message and (b) is or will be reasonably and readily available
>> to and interpretable by any player at all times between the end of
>> the voting
3 matches
Mail list logo
