Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: Proposal: No More Distributability

2009-06-10 Thread Ed Murphy
Tiger wrote: > 2009/6/10 Benjamin Caplan : >> Kerim Aydin wrote: >>> On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote: I act on behalf of coppro to support this. I act on behalf of Pavitra to support this. I act on behalf of zeckalpha to support this. Having received sufficient support, I m

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: Proposal: No More Distributability

2009-06-10 Thread Elliott Hird
That was what zooping did. On 2009-06-10, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > 2009/6/10 Benjamin Caplan : >> Kerim Aydin wrote: >>> On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote: I act on behalf of coppro to support this. I act on behalf of Pavitra to support this. I act on behalf of zeckalpha to suppo

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: Proposal: No More Distributability

2009-06-10 Thread Jonatan Kilhamn
2009/6/10 Benjamin Caplan : > Kerim Aydin wrote: >> On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote: >>> I act on behalf of coppro to support this. I act on behalf of Pavitra >>> to support this. I act on behalf of zeckalpha to support this. Having >>> received sufficient support, I make this proposal dis

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: Proposal: No More Distributability

2009-06-09 Thread Benjamin Caplan
Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote: >> I act on behalf of coppro to support this. I act on behalf of Pavitra >> to support this. I act on behalf of zeckalpha to support this. Having >> received sufficient support, I make this proposal distributable. > > You should come u

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: Proposal: No More Distributability

2009-06-09 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Sean Hunt wrote: >>> Aaron Goldfein wrote: Oops. I've confused the new players. I act on behalf of allispaul to support this. Having received sufficient support, I make

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: Proposal: No More Distributability

2009-06-09 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Sean Hunt wrote: >> Aaron Goldfein wrote: >>> Oops. I've confused the new players. I act on behalf of allispaul to >>> support this. Having received sufficient support, I make this proposal >>> distributable. >> The trick i

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: Proposal: No More Distributability

2009-06-09 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Sean Hunt wrote: > Aaron Goldfein wrote: >> Oops. I've confused the new players. I act on behalf of allispaul to >> support this. Having received sufficient support, I make this proposal >> distributable. > The trick is that allispaul is named Paul. Funny, I still have that pr

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: Proposal: No More Distributability

2009-06-09 Thread Sean Hunt
Aaron Goldfein wrote: > Oops. I've confused the new players. I act on behalf of allispaul to > support this. Having received sufficient support, I make this proposal > distributable. The trick is that allispaul is named Paul.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: Proposal: No More Distributability

2009-06-09 Thread Sean Hunt
Aaron Goldfein wrote: > On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: >> Proposal: No More Distributability (AI = 2, II = 2) >> >> Amend Rule 1607 (The Promotor) to read: >> >> The Promotor is an office; its holder is responsible for >> receiving and distributing proposals. >> >>

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: Proposal: No More Distributability

2009-06-09 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > I act on behalf of coppro to support this. I act on behalf of Pavitra > to support this. I act on behalf of zeckalpha to support this. Having > received sufficient support, I make this proposal distributable. You should come up with an acronym for this.