BobTHJ wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 6:14 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
5440 AGAINST (you forgot to give the rule Power 2, so its attempt to
alter voting limits would be ineffective)
Drat. For some reason I had it in my head that new rules are created
with the same power as the pro
On Feb 5, 2008 6:14 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 5440 AGAINST (you forgot to give the rule Power 2, so its attempt to
> alter voting limits would be ineffective)
Drat. For some reason I had it in my head that new rules are created
with the same power as the proposal that spaw
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Maybe the one you proposed for root, I haven't seen the vote count
>> yet :).
>
> BobTHJ, you mean? Deconstructing the Writ of FAGE is perfectly good
> grounds for a Patent Title, if you ask me.
No, I meant the one to root for pioneering voting ROOT. That
Goethe wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
h previously-awarded Patent Titles would you put into this
category? Particularly anything that (a) was awarded by proposal
and (b) received less than 3-to-2 support.
Maybe the one you proposed for root, I haven't seen the vote count
yet :
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
h previously-awarded Patent Titles would you put into this
> category? Particularly anything that (a) was awarded by proposal
> and (b) received less than 3-to-2 support.
Maybe the one you proposed for root, I haven't seen the vote count
yet :). Anyway sim
On Feb 5, 2008 9:23 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Speaking of, I haven't had time to grok VLOD yet. Can it now
> apply to decisions other than whether to adopt proposals, or is
> it basically just a change of terminology?
In theory, VLOD and VLDD apply to any decision with an adoptio
Goethe wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
5437 AGAINST x 13 (convince me why this is needed)
Because Patent Titles should be actually Worth Something, and not
just accumulated, easy-to-come-by clutter. -Goethe
Which previously-awarded Patent Titles would you put into this
category
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
> 5437 AGAINST x 13 (convince me why this is needed)
Because Patent Titles should be actually Worth Something, and not
just accumulated, easy-to-come-by clutter. -Goethe
8 matches
Mail list logo
