Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 5042-5049

2007-06-26 Thread Ian Kelly
On 6/26/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "At the end of the voting period of an Agoran decision, the first N ballots submitted by each entity on that decision (where N is the entity's effective voting limit for that decision) remain valid; all other ballots submitted on that decision are

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 5042-5049

2007-06-26 Thread Ed Murphy
root wrote: On 6/26/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "At the end of the voting period of an Agoran decision, the first N ballots submitted by each entity on that decision (where N is the entity's voting limit for that proposal) remain valid; all other ballots submitted on that decisio

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 5042-5049

2007-06-26 Thread Ian Kelly
On 6/26/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You also seem to be conflating "Agoran decision" with "proposal". Currently, proposals are the only Agoran decisions defined, but it would be good to be able to add new types of Agoran decisions without having to fix this Power-3 rule. Otherwise,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 5042-5049

2007-06-26 Thread Ian Kelly
On 6/26/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: root wrote: > On 6/26/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "At the end of the voting period of an Agoran decision, the first >> N ballots submitted by each entity on that decision (where N is >> the entity's voting limit) rem

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 5042-5049

2007-06-26 Thread Ed Murphy
root wrote: On 6/26/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "At the end of the voting period of an Agoran decision, the first N ballots submitted by each entity on that decision (where N is the entity's voting limit) remain valid; all other ballots submitted on that decisi

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 5042-5049

2007-06-26 Thread Ian Kelly
On 6/26/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: root wrote: > On 6/25/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 5047 AGAINST (see above; existing rule could be interpreted as "voting >> limit on the proposal's current chamber at the start of its >> voting period"; this is awkw

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 5042-5049

2007-06-25 Thread Ed Murphy
root wrote: On 6/25/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 5047 AGAINST (see above; existing rule could be interpreted as "voting limit on the proposal's current chamber at the start of its voting period"; this is awkward, but so is the phrase "ballot allotment time")

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 5042-5049

2007-06-25 Thread Ian Kelly
On 6/25/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 5047 AGAINST (see above; existing rule could be interpreted as "voting limit on the proposal's current chamber at the start of its voting period"; this is awkward, but so is the phrase "ballot allotment time") "...where N