On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 14:41 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>
> >> 6038 O 1 1.7 comex Moment of Silence
> > AGAINSTx8 (I believe only 5 of these are valid, but get slightly
> > confused as to how the Holiday screws up voting power.)
>
> Your caste was 5 both before and after
ais523 wrote:
>> 6038 O 1 1.7 comex Moment of Silence
> AGAINSTx8 (I believe only 5 of these are valid, but get slightly
> confused as to how the Holiday screws up voting power.)
Your caste was 5 both before and after the recent caste rotation,
which occurred a few minutes after the
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 19:07 -0600, Pavitra wrote:
> > 6040 D 1 3.0 ais523 Scam reset
> PRESENT. If the intent is to resolve ambiguity, why is it conditional
> on the efficacy of a scam?
The intention is to refund points that the scam unfairly removed from
people, not to resolve ambigu
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Pavitra wrote:
>> 6046 D 1 2.0 comex Cruft
> AGAINST. "remove ... all text under it" arguably does not stop at the
> beginning of (c), and might even delete all sufficiently low-powered
> rules listed after 1023 in the Logical Rulesets. It's also entir
4 matches
Mail list logo
