Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5991-6003

2008-12-02 Thread Ed Murphy
Wooble wrote: > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I fill my own sell ticket on 5997, specifying FOR. >> I fill my own sell ticket on 5998, specifying FOR. > > Does this even work? A vote of SELL is, by contract, a vote > conditionally endorsing the filler of the

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5991-6003

2008-12-02 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I fill my own sell ticket on 5997, specifying FOR. > I fill my own sell ticket on 5998, specifying FOR. Does this even work? A vote of SELL is, by contract, a vote conditionally endorsing the filler of the ticket, not a vote condi

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5991-6003

2008-11-30 Thread 0x44
Sgeo wrote: On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 4:02 PM, 0x44 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sgeo wrote: 5991 D 1 2.0 Elysion Cantus Cygneus Only If You Mean It v2 5992 D 0 2.0 Bayes 5993 D 0 3.0 Bayes 5994 D 1 3.0 Murphy Loose ID numbers 5995 D 1

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5991-6003

2008-11-29 Thread Ed Murphy
Pavitra wrote: >> 5994 D 1 3.0 Murphy Loose ID numbers > SELL(1VP - AGAINST). Why is this useful? To assign CFJ numbers in the > 10,000s to junk cases? De facto assignment of ID numbers generally follows the order in which they were initiated (except for criminal cases; I file inten