Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 7144-7153

2012-01-12 Thread Ed Murphy
omd wrote: On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: 7145 2 omd A controversial proposal AGAINST (I think you meant "unambiguous" there at the end?) The intent expressed in such a message is necessarily ambiguous, but required to be unambiguous. My AGAINST sta

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 7144-7153

2012-01-10 Thread omd
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> 7145 2   omd                  A controversial proposal > > AGAINST (I think you meant "unambiguous" there at the end?) The intent expressed in such a message is necessarily ambiguous, but required to be unambiguous.