omd wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Ed Murphy<emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote:7145 2 omd A controversial proposalAGAINST (I think you meant "unambiguous" there at the end?)The intent expressed in such a message is necessarily ambiguous, but required to be unambiguous.
My AGAINST stands; should be changed to e.g. "any such intent", or just "such a message". Also, I recommend removing "primarily".
