Oh blimey. I might just keep my judgement in place and add an explanatory
note later. Unless anyone wants to support the moot. One more for that.
On Thursday, July 6, 2017, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> NttPF.
>
> Greetings,
> Ørjan.
>
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2017, V.J Rada wrote:
>
> I move reconsideration.
NttPF.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Thu, 6 Jul 2017, V.J Rada wrote:
I move reconsideration.
I recuse myself.
On Thursday, July 6, 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
TTttPF
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.co
I'm recused now, the judgement doesn't count. I refused because I'm on
mobile and don't really want to deal with the linked deputization issue. I
recommend both cfjs be assigned to the same person. I arbitrarily recommend
quazie.
The point PSS raised doesn't matter though. In a car auction, the
au
I move reconsideration.
I recuse myself.
On Thursday, July 6, 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> TTttPF
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> > On Jul 5, 2017, at 5:16 PM, Publius Scribonius
I move to enter this judgement into moot.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jul 5, 2017, at 4:35 PM, V.J Rada wrote:
>
> This contains my motion to reconsider and my
> adressing your argument (although cursorily)
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:42 PM,
Except you should observe that an action does not cause the property to be
transferred. A person must still cause it to be transferred.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jul 5, 2017, at 1:42 PM, V.J Rada wrote:
>
> I move to reconsider (you can't, y
Ah, OK. All good, thank you.
Enviado desde mi iPhone
> El 5 jul 2017, a las 22:35, V.J Rada escribió:
>
> I move to reconsider (you can't, you cndan intend to move
> and wait for two support.
>
> I'm judging this FALSE. GASP! Surprise rocks the nation.
> I'm not judging it FALSE because auctio
Where did you post the reconsideration? I only find the original Judgement.
> El 5 jul 2017, a las 22:19, V.J Rada escribió:
>
> Posting to business because each A-D post might
> be a seperate breach.
>
> I already moved to reconsider and did so. You can
> now intend to, with two support, enter
I do that.
Enviado desde mi iPhone
> El 5 jul 2017, a las 19:42, V.J Rada escribió:
>
> I move to reconsider (you can't, you cndan intend to move
> and wait for two support.
>
> I'm judging this FALSE. GASP! Surprise rocks the nation.
> I'm not judging it FALSE because auctioning is a regulate
I motion to reconsider.
Whether the winning bid can actually make a transfer or not shouldn't
affect if there is actually an *auction* or not in the first place, I
believe.
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:14 AM, V.J Rada wrote:
> I'm judging this FALSE. GASP! Surprise rocks the nation.
> I'm not jud
10 matches
Mail list logo
