Where did you post the reconsideration? I only find the original Judgement.
> El 5 jul 2017, a las 22:19, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> escribió: > > Posting to business because each A-D post might > be a seperate breach. > > I already moved to reconsider and did so. You can > now intend to, with two support, enter the judgement > into Moot, which will trigger a vote. > >> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I intend to motion to reconsider based on "Whether the winning bid can >> actually make a transfer or not shouldn't affect if there is actually an >> *auction* or not in the first place, I believe." >> >> Enviado desde mi iPhone >> >>> El 5 jul 2017, a las 18:34, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> escribió: >>> >>> I motion to reconsider. >>> >>> Whether the winning bid can actually make a transfer or not shouldn't >>> affect if there is actually an *auction* or not in the first place, I >>> believe. >>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:14 AM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I'm judging this FALSE. GASP! Surprise rocks the nation. >>>> I'm not judging it FALSE because auctioning is a regulated >>>> action though. It seems to me that despite the auction >>>> provisions, people could auction their own property >>>> without breaching the rules. I'm judging it based on the fact >>>> that Estate ownership is regulated, and CB's attempt to auction >>>> off Estates owned by another entity (Agora) and person (Josh) >>>> does not work. >>>> >>>> "A player who owns an Estate can and may transfer it to any >>>> player, to any Organization, or to Agora, by announcement" >>>> from rule 2489 regulates Estate ownership, as does the auction >>>> provision. This, mixed with the fact that the ordinary meaning of >>>> the word "Owner" means someone who can control their >>>> property, precludes anyone from taking an Estate from its owner >>>> or causing it to be taken from em, unless specifically authorized >>>> by rule (such as the auction provision). >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 12:12 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 2017-07-02 at 02:21 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote: >>>>> > The moment is ripe to attempt something like this, because it's Auction >>>>> > time. Let's go: >>>>> > >>>>> > Putting Estates up to Auction is an unregulated action, much like >>>>> > withdrawing. (I don't personally believe this - because I believe all >>>>> > actions in the universe are Regulated - but many others do, so I'm going >>>>> > off that). In case its of doubt, the following states an obligation for >>>>> > the >>>>> > Surveyor to perform, so its not a description of "circumstances under >>>>> > which >>>>> > the action would succeed or fail": >>>>> > >>>>> > "At the start of each month, if Agora owns at least one Estate, the >>>>> > Surveyor shall put one Estate which is owned by Agora up for auction, by >>>>> > announcement. Each auction ends seven days after it begins." >>>>> > >>>>> > Additionally, the state of being in an auction or not is tracked by >>>>> > nobody, >>>>> > so it doesn't infringe "would, as part of its effect, modify information >>>>> > for which some player is required to be a recordkeepor" >>>>> > >>>>> > Therefore: >>>>> > >>>>> > - I put every Estate up for Auction, (even those owned by other >>>>> > players, if >>>>> > possible). >>>>> > - I then bid a million shinies on each of them. >>>>> > - I then bid one shiny on each of them. >>>>> > >>>>> > I have absolutely no defense towards other people bidding more than a >>>>> > million and using my own "scam" to win auctions, which only works versus >>>>> > the "conventional" way of winning them by bidding amounts of cash you >>>>> > actually own. >>>>> > >>>>> > I CFJ: "There is currently more than one auction for Estates" >>>>> > >>>>> > That's all. >>>>> >>>>> This is CFJ 3537. I assign it to V.J. Rada. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> ais523 >>>>> Arbitor >
