On Sunday 21 October 2007 13:57:13 Zefram wrote:
> What about the agreement to form a R1742 contract? I believe all of
> the currently registered partnerships were formed outside the public
> forum.
> We have historically had a great many game actions that took place
> outside the public forum;
Josiah Worcester wrote:
>Name to me one method of performing game actions in the rules
>*outside* of public announcement.
To take a recent example, rule 2173/0:
# The parties to a public contract SHALL keep the Notary informed
# of its text and set of parties.
Keeping the notary infor
Josiah Worcester wrote:
>It seems to me that such an agreement would need to be a game
>action. . . And thus need to be in a public forum.
What about the agreement to form a R1742 contract? I believe all of the
currently registered partnerships were formed outside the public forum.
We have histo
On Sunday 21 October 2007 13:35:37 Taral wrote:
> I disagree. Rule 2157 does not require that agreement be public,
only
> that it exists. If you disagree, please, call a CFJ. ;)
It seems to me that such an agreement would need to be a game
action. . . And thus need to be in a public forum.
On 10/21/07, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 21 October 2007 13:03:13 Taral wrote:
> > Having received the consent of the members,
> comex's consent was not given in a public forum, thus it was not an
> actual game action. Therefore, you have *not* received the consent of
>
Josiah Worcester wrote:
>comex's consent was not given in a public forum,
R2157 doesn't require public agreement, merely agreement.
-zefram
On Sunday 21 October 2007 13:03:13 Taral wrote:
> Having received the consent of the members,
comex's consent was not given in a public forum, thus it was not an
actual game action. Therefore, you have *not* received the consent of
all members. If you disagree, please, call a CFJ. ;)
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 11:47:52 Taral wrote:
> On 10/4/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I hereby assign the judicial panel of comex, Goddess Eris, and
pikhq as
> > judge of CFJ 1748a.
>
> I intend, with consent of the other members, to cause the panel to
> judge REMAND, with the foll
8 matches
Mail list logo
