Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of proposal 6581

2009-11-17 Thread comex
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > There does not exist a instant of time t at which you could call a > CFJ for which the statement "I have cast an infinite number of votes" > would be true.  -G. n.b. (you replied in plaintext, so I'm not sure if you saw it) that was a HTML ma

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of proposal 6581

2009-11-17 Thread Pavitra
Ed Murphy wrote: > c. wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn >> wrote: >>> NUM II AI SUBMITTER CHAMBER TITLE >>> 6581 1 1.0 G.* GreenBirthdayland >> >> I vote FOR an infinite number of times. > > I'm treating this as ineffective because

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of proposal 6581

2009-11-17 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, comex wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: >>> I vote FOR an infinite number of times. >> >> I'm treating this as ineffective because you couldn't write it >> out individually. > > Sure you can: > > I vote FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FO >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of proposal 6581

2009-11-17 Thread comex
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> I vote FOR an infinite number of times. > > I'm treating this as ineffective because you couldn't write it > out individually. Sure you can: I vote FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FO -- -c., who isn't very serious

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of proposal 6581

2009-11-17 Thread Ed Murphy
c. wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn > wrote: >> NUM II AI SUBMITTER CHAMBER TITLE >> 6581 1 1.0 G.* GreenBirthdayland > > I vote FOR an infinite number of times. I'm treating this as ineffective because you couldn't write it out indiv