On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote:
>> I vote FOR an infinite number of times.
>
> I'm treating this as ineffective because you couldn't write it
> out individually.

Sure you can:

I vote FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FO

-- 
-c., who isn't very serious

Reply via email to