On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> As fun as it would be to keep stringing you all along, I feel I should come
> clean:
> I am not trying to hide any specific announcement of intent to perform a
> dependent
> action. What really happened is that I mixed up the proposal ID numbers
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> A) How did you even find that?
> B) I find that argument throughly unpersuasive and recant it. Considering
> the interest of the game is a last resort, and it is most assuredly not in
> the best interest of the game for the success of an action to be j
A) How did you even find that?
I was searching through the archive several weeks ago for something else,
and came across it. The concept of content neutrality stuck in my mind for
some reason so I remembered it.
Ah, the CFJ 1460 judgement doesn't actually use the word "action" - that was
part of my paraphrasing, apologies for the confusion. I don't believe it's
germane whether or not the intent or the objection are in fact actions
performed by announcement. In fact, the first example given in the judgem
On the other hand, there is this reasoning by Aris from a prior email chain
that may be persuasive for why this kind of objection may be valid:
https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg29565.html
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 8:18 PM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> CFJ, barring G.:
Ok folks, first of all, this is *quite* suspicious, so it's worth our
time to hunt down which one twg is worried about.
Secondly, there is a standing precedent for this working - I'll dig
it up later, but the point is - no effort required - no one is
required to look anything up until someone a
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-10-15 at 16:43 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > I object to all intents to perform actions without N objections
> > (for all values of N) that have been announced by people other
> > than myself in the last 14 days.
>
> I think it'd probably
On Mon, 2018-10-15 at 16:43 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I object to all intents to perform actions without N objections
> (for all values of N) that have been announced by people other
> than myself in the last 14 days.
I think it'd probably be a good idea to require announcements of intent
to b
I was also thinking 7 was too high, but 3 is too low - it's basically
noise in the way people go up and down. How's 5?
On Sun, 14 Oct 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 9:55 PM Reuben Staley
> wrote:
>
> > I vote as follows:
> >
> > On 10/14/2018 06:06 PM, Aris Merchant wro
On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 9:55 PM Reuben Staley
wrote:
> I vote as follows:
>
> On 10/14/2018 06:06 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > ID Author(s)AITitle
> >
> ---
> > 8105* Trigon 0.5 Trust no one
> F
10 matches
Mail list logo
