On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Probably you can ratify people out of contracts, but I'm not sure if you
> can ratify them into them.
Not without their explicit, willful consent, you can't. Staying quiet
isn't explicit enough, especially if you're not aware
On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 20:38 -0800, Charles Schaefer wrote:
>
> The Notary report appears up to date as of November 8th, and the last
> three weeks of a-b looks managable.
>
I'm pretty sure it was wrong with respect to the Protection Racket, and
possibly also with respect to Werewolves. The Werewo
On 1 Dec 2008, at 15:05, Alex Smith wrote:
I will make the my history log of the Notary's report available to
anyone elected as the new Notary, to help sort out the pledges which
were terminated by proposal and retroactively unterminated by a
further
proposal. Apart from that, I can't really
On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 15:59 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
> ehird wrote:
>
> > On 30 Nov 2008, at 22:15, Charles Schaefer wrote:
> >
> >> I might as well jump in head first. I also accept my nomination.
> >
> > You get to do with a many-week backlog, plain incorrect info, and
> > inconsiderate message
On 1 Dec 2008, at 04:38, Charles Schaefer wrote:
The Notary report appears up to date as of November 8th, and the
last three weeks of a-b looks managable.
There is some incorrectness in it, actually - in my brief stint as
Notary I noticed changes from days back not tracked and Wooble has
>
> The Notary report appears up to date as of November 8th, and the last three
weeks of a-b looks managable.
--
Charles Schaefer
2008/11/30, Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> Notary is not as easy as you think.
>
> I don't think it's easy at all. But it happens to be the only office
currently up for election, and it would be nice to start off my playing by
cleaning up a mess. (and playing Werewolves, which is what finall
On 1 Dec 2008, at 00:49, Charles Schaefer wrote:
Oh, okay. No big deal.
Notary is not as easy as you think.
2008/11/30, Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 1 Dec 2008, at 00:24, Charles Schaefer wrote:
>
> As for the inconsiderate messages
>
>
> As in "ill-specified ones that work anyway but you have to figure out"
>
Oh, okay. No big deal.
--
Charles Schaefer
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Pavitra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Even if it's not required, I consider it a SHOULD; at the least, it's
> courteous to recordkeepors to minimize the implicitness of relevant
> information.
For the record, since implicit consent was removed, I've been ignoring
me
On 1 Dec 2008, at 00:24, Charles Schaefer wrote:
As for the inconsiderate messages
As in "ill-specified ones that work anyway but you have to figure out"
2008/11/30, Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>
> You get to do with a many-week backlog, plain incorrect info, and
> inconsiderate messages.
>
I deal with the first two on a regular basis in RL. As for the inconsiderate
messages, if I receive any I'll send an even more inconsiderate reply.
--
ehird wrote:
> On 30 Nov 2008, at 22:15, Charles Schaefer wrote:
>
>> I might as well jump in head first. I also accept my nomination.
>
> You get to do with a many-week backlog, plain incorrect info, and
> inconsiderate messages.
>
> Woo!
On the other hand, you can make a good-faith effort an
On 30 Nov 2008, at 22:15, Charles Schaefer wrote:
I might as well jump in head first. I also accept my nomination.
You get to do with a many-week backlog, plain incorrect info, and
inconsiderate messages.
Woo!
On Sunday 30 November 2008 04:08:56 pm Sgeo wrote:
> I decline my nomination to Notary, even though last time I checked,
> nominations require active consent, not not declining.
Even if it's not required, I consider it a SHOULD; at the least, it's
courteous to recordkeepors to minimize the implic
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2008, at 2:31 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>
>> This message serves to initiate the Agoran Decisions to choose the
>> holders of the Notary and Herald offices. The eligible voters are the
>> active players and t
16 matches
Mail list logo
