On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Pavitra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Even if it's not required, I consider it a SHOULD; at the least, it's > courteous to recordkeepors to minimize the implicitness of relevant > information.
For the record, since implicit consent was removed, I've been ignoring messages declining nominations; I only recordkeep acceptances. And I don't think anyone wants messages from all of the active players declining a nomination in their inbox.
