On 6 April 2011 21:24, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> This message serves to initiate the Agoran Decision to choose the
>> holder of the Registrar office. The eligible voters are the active
>> first-class players, and the vote collector is the IAD
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Inaction is not action. And if this was triggered by an Agoran
>> Consent success, then I'd argue that only the player completing
>> the process would be on the hook.
>
> Here's the simplest case: (1)
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> > On 11-03-19 02:57 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> >> The Speaker CAN, by announcement, cause the President to take
>> >> an action that is not otherwise IMPOSSIBLE. If there is no
>> >> Speaker, then the player who was most rec
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
> G. wrote:
>
> >> Causing the President to perform an ILLEGAL action is the
> >> Class-6 crime of Misleading the Leader.
> >
> > Personally, I was waiting for an Agoran Consent failure to publish a report
> > so that we could see if all Agorans
G. wrote:
>> Causing the President to perform an ILLEGAL action is the
>> Class-6 crime of Misleading the Leader.
>
> Personally, I was waiting for an Agoran Consent failure to publish a report
> so that we could see if all Agorans who didn't support could be found
> guilty of this.
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
> scshunt wrote:
>
> > On 11-03-19 02:57 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> >>The Speaker CAN, by announcement, cause the President to take
> >>an action that is not otherwise IMPOSSIBLE. If there is no
> >>Speaker, then the player who was most
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Wooble wrote:
>
> > I intend, with Agoran Consent, to cause the President to intend to
> > deputize to publish the Registrar's report.
> > I intend, with Agoran Consent, to cause the President to deputize for
> > the Registrar to publish the Registrar's re
On 11-03-19 03:30 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
The President being required to do impossible actions seems rare enough
not to worry about it until a specific example comes up. (The "any
first-class player" clause doesn't include the IMPOSSIBLE bit either.)
What about the Agoran Consent or without obje
scshunt wrote:
> On 11-03-19 02:57 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>The Speaker CAN, by announcement, cause the President to take
>>an action that is not otherwise IMPOSSIBLE. If there is no
>>Speaker, then the player who was most recently Speaker (if
>>any) CAN, by announce
On 11-03-19 02:57 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
The Speaker CAN, by announcement, cause the President to take
an action that is not otherwise IMPOSSIBLE. If there is no
Speaker, then the player who was most recently Speaker (if
any) CAN, by announcement, cause the President to
The probability of the job almost certainly not getting done if the
President holds it aside, will publishing a report this week change your
mind?
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 09:31, Jonathan Rouillard <
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I also vote for The President. Sorry Yally. =P
>
> ~ Roujo
coppro wrote:
> On 06/13/2010 05:07 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> coppro wrote:
>>
>>> I hereby resolve the election for Registrar; votes were as follows:
>>>
>>> Murphy E Wooble => Wooble
>>> Wooble => Wooble
>>>
>>> Wooble wins with 2 votes to whatever and remains Registrar.
>>
>> CoE: Either it fa
On 06/13/2010 05:07 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
I hereby resolve the election for Registrar; votes were as follows:
Murphy E Wooble => Wooble
Wooble => Wooble
Wooble wins with 2 votes to whatever and remains Registrar.
CoE: Either it failed quorum or the voting period was doubled.
On 06/13/2010 05:07 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
I hereby resolve the election for Registrar; votes were as follows:
Murphy E Wooble => Wooble
Wooble => Wooble
Wooble wins with 2 votes to whatever and remains Registrar.
CoE: Either it failed quorum or the voting period was doubled.
On 06/06/2010 01:55 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
This message serves to initiate the Agoran Decision to decide the
holder of the office of Registrar. For this Decision, the
eligible voters are all the active first-class players, each with a
voting limit of one. The Intergalactic Associate
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Charles Walker <
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>On 5/21/09 9:03 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> > I initiate an Agoran decision to decide the holder of the Registrar
>> > office. The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector
>> > is the
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 09:32 -0400, Quazie wrote:
> Wooble is how i vote.
Lowercase i? Are you gwen in disguise?
--
ais523
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 May 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> >> I initiate an Agoran decision to decide the holder of the Registrar
> >> office. The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector
> >> is the IADoP, and the o
comex wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:52 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think the Mad Scientist would be required to act on behalf of the
>> Monster to publish on time (publishing a report is something the Monster
>> SHALL do if it's an officeholdor). There isn't an obvious Monsterk
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:52 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the Mad Scientist would be required to act on behalf of the
> Monster to publish on time (publishing a report is something the Monster
> SHALL do if it's an officeholdor). There isn't an obvious Monsterkeepor,
> although w
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 17:06 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> > I actually considered nominating myself when I saw the options, but
> > I'd have to wait for the current election to end. Besides, the
> > Monster might actually make an interesting Registrar.
>
> Wo
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 15:43 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>
> > I took on Registrar because nobody else seemed to want it, but I'm not
> > too attached to it really. It's not even as if I get anything for doing
> > it (as both Notary and Mad Scientist earn me the same pitch of note).
> >
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 15/10/2008, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If a Player registers, e should take responsibilities. I vote Bayes.
>>>
>>>
>>> Say that to $EVERY_PARTNERSHIP_HERE.
>>
>> Sure. No worries. I agree. If any partnership is nominated when e do
On 15/10/2008, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
>> On 14 Oct 2008, at 22:05, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>>> If a Player registers, e should take responsibilities. I vote Bayes.
>>
>>
>> Say that to $EVERY_PARTNERSHIP_HERE.
>
> Sure. No worries. I agr
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> I actually considered nominating myself when I saw the options, but
>> I'd have to wait for the current election to end. Besides, the
>> Monster might actually make an interesting R
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 14 Oct 2008, at 22:05, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>> If a Player registers, e should take responsibilities. I vote Bayes.
>
>
> Say that to $EVERY_PARTNERSHIP_HERE.
Sure. No worries. I agree. If any partnership is nominated when e doesn't
want to be e
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> I actually considered nominating myself when I saw the options, but
> I'd have to wait for the current election to end. Besides, the
> Monster might actually make an interesting Registrar.
Would the Monsterkeepor be required to publish report on time on
be
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>
>> I took on Registrar because nobody else seemed to want it, but I'm not
>> too attached to it really. It's not even as if I get anything for doing
>> it (as both Notary and Mad Scientist earn me the same pitch
ais523 wrote:
> I took on Registrar because nobody else seemed to want it, but I'm not
> too attached to it really. It's not even as if I get anything for doing
> it (as both Notary and Mad Scientist earn me the same pitch of note).
> Apart from forum scams, of course, but I doubt there will be ma
On 14 Oct 2008, at 22:41, Charles Reiss wrote:
Bayes could just resign. Wouldn't that be easier?
-woggle
Oh.
... Yea.
--
ehird
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 14:32, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14 Oct 2008, at 22:05, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>> If a Player registers, e should take responsibilities. I vote Bayes.
>
>
> Say that to $EVERY_PARTNERSHIP_HERE.
>
> Btw, if Bayes gets elected e will deregister and Seyab will
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 15:28 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:24 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> ais523
> >> the Monster
> >> ehird
> >> Bayes
> >
> > A choice between ehird and ais523?
> > I
On 14 Oct 2008, at 22:05, Kerim Aydin wrote:
If a Player registers, e should take responsibilities. I vote Bayes.
Say that to $EVERY_PARTNERSHIP_HERE.
Btw, if Bayes gets elected e will deregister and Seyab will pop up.
--
ehird
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:24 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ais523
>> the Monster
>> ehird
>> Bayes
>
> A choice between ehird and ais523?
> I vote for Goethe.
I actually considered nominating myself when I saw t
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 17:24 -0400, comex wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ais523
> > the Monster
> > ehird
> > Bayes
>
> A choice between ehird and ais523?
> I vote for Goethe.
You'd better vote for the Monster if you don't want Bayes to end u
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 04:07:28 pm Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Kerim Aydin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If a Player registers, e should take responsibilities. I vote
> > Bayes.
>
> I shudder at the thought of what Bayes might do with the
> Registrar's report...
Noth
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If a Player registers, e should take responsibilities. I vote Bayes.
I shudder at the thought of what Bayes might do with the Registrar's report...
-root
37 matches
Mail list logo
