On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Yally wrote:
>
>> I really can't say I have a clear idea of what "zooping" means. I
>> don't know if it's something from a contract, some foreign word, some
>> strange nomic word I'm not familiar with, or just a way to add a silly
>> word that me
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> I really can't say I have a clear idea of what "zooping" means. I
>> don't know if it's something from a contract, some foreign word, some
>> strange nomic word I'm not familiar with, or just a way to add a silly
>> word that means nothing. For
> I really can't say I have a clear idea of what "zooping" means. I
> don't know if it's something from a contract, some foreign word, some
> strange nomic word I'm not familiar with, or just a way to add a silly
> word that means nothing. For that matter, I opine that 2736 is FALSE.
>
> -Yally
>
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>> CoE: This CFJ may not exist. Murphy's conditional initiation of a CFJ
>> probably failed on the basis that the conditional was not obvious to
>> evaluate.
>
> Denied. Conditional actions in general don't have this sort of formal
> standard
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 11:20 -0500, comex wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:18 AM, ais523 wrote:
> > CoE: This CFJ may not exist. Murphy's conditional initiation of a CFJ
> > probably failed on the basis that the conditional was not obvious to
> > evaluate.
>
> As much as I wish this were the ca
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:18 AM, ais523 wrote:
> CoE: This CFJ may not exist. Murphy's conditional initiation of a CFJ
> probably failed on the basis that the conditional was not obvious to
> evaluate.
As much as I wish this were the case, precedent is that conditions
whose truth values are not
6 matches
Mail list logo
