On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Ed Murphy wrote: > ais523 wrote: >> CoE: This CFJ may not exist. Murphy's conditional initiation of a CFJ >> probably failed on the basis that the conditional was not obvious to >> evaluate. > > Denied. Conditional actions in general don't have this sort of formal > standard like conditional votes do.
No, but they do take on "standard definitions" of conditional, possibly tending towards mathematical (Definition Definitions) which do strongly suggest formal evaluation. Otherwise, why would we be worried all the time about generic non-vote conditionals splitting the platonic and pragmatic gamestates? -G.
