On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Pavitra wrote:
> However, I strongly disagree with that syllogism. Such a precedent would
> allow low-powered rules to effectively override high-powered ones, by
> pretending to avoid conflict while subverting the natural meaning of the
> high-powered rule entirely.
I think o
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 17:18 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> If you'd like you can insert "in the judges opinion" after "the
>> correct choice", because that is what matters here. Judges have
>> latitude to select what they believe to be the best option when faced
Sean Hunt wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 01:00, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2682
>>>
>>> == CFJ 2682 ==
>>>
>>>It is POSSIBLE to increase a player's voting limit
ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 17:34 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> You seem to be missing the point here. This is not a matter of what is
>> true and what is false. In this case, because of the way the rule is
>> worded, there are two possible ways to interpret the rule. Both are
>> equally
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 17:40, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 17:34 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> You seem to be missing the point here. This is not a matter of what is
>> true and what is false. In this case, because of the way the rule is
>> worded, there are two possible ways to interpret
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 17:34 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
> You seem to be missing the point here. This is not a matter of what is
> true and what is false. In this case, because of the way the rule is
> worded, there are two possible ways to interpret the rule. Both are
> equally viable ways to interp
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 17:23, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 17:18 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> If you'd like you can insert "in the judges opinion" after "the
>> correct choice", because that is what matters here. Judges have
>> latitude to select what they believe to be the best option w
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 17:18 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
> If you'd like you can insert "in the judges opinion" after "the
> correct choice", because that is what matters here. Judges have
> latitude to select what they believe to be the best option when faced
> with multiple equally-plausible interpr
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 17:07, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 01:00, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>>
>>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2682
>>>
>>> == CFJ 2682 ==
>>>
>>> It is POSSIB
9 matches
Mail list logo
