Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2454b assigned to Rodlen, ehird, coppro

2009-04-23 Thread Rodlen
Heh, I'm on a panel so quickly. Wow. Well, I'm off to research this case. --Rodlen

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2454b assigned to Rodlen, ehird, coppro

2009-04-23 Thread Sean Hunt
Aaron Goldfein wrote: > Then vote to affirm. You only need 2/3 votes. Yes, but then the appeals panel has to publish a Concurring Opinion, which takes unanimity, and we're lazy. I can't take my opinion back anyways, so it's moot at this point (if ehird and Rodlen both move to AFFIRM, I will of co

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2454b assigned to Rodlen, ehird, coppro

2009-04-23 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > Aaron Goldfein wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Sean Hunt > > wrote: > > > > Ed Murphy wrote: > > > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2454b > > > > I opine REASSIG

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2454b assigned to Rodlen, ehird, coppro

2009-04-23 Thread Sean Hunt
Aaron Goldfein wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Sean Hunt > wrote: > > Ed Murphy wrote: > > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2454b > > I opine REASSIGN. Yally has twice failed to provide a complete and valid > reas

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2454b assigned to Rodlen, ehird, coppro

2009-04-23 Thread Ian Kelly
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: >> >> Ed Murphy wrote: >> > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2454b >> >> I opine REASSIGN. Yally has twice failed to provide a complete and valid >> reasoning fo

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2454b assigned to Rodlen, ehird, coppro

2009-04-23 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > Ed Murphy wrote: > > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2454b > > I opine REASSIGN. Yally has twice failed to provide a complete and valid > reasoning for eir judgment. > > I don't get it. If you disagree with my judgment,

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2454b assigned to Rodlen, ehird, coppro

2009-04-23 Thread Ed Murphy
coppro wrote: > * Kneeling. Kneeling players are unqualified to judge. I'd prefer "supine and can't change until X", which could also apply to recusal by the CotC. If you do create a separate posture, then it should have an explanatory comment like "will become sitting when the CotC rotat