Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Sean Hunt <ride...@gmail.com
> <mailto:ride...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Ed Murphy wrote:
> > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2454b
>
> I opine REASSIGN. Yally has twice failed to provide a complete and valid
> reasoning for eir judgment.
>
>
> I don't get it. If you disagree with my judgment, why not just overrule?
>
Because the judgment is the correct judgment, but hasn't been properly
reasoned through. AFFIRM would also be appropriate in this case,
providing a Supporting Opinion - but that's tougher to get through a panel.
