Taral wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> You have no support.
>
> Don't need it. R1504.
Ah, that is indeed correct. My mistake.
-coppro
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> You have no support.
Don't need it. R1504.
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
Taral wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Judge ehird's Arguments:
>>
>> GUILTY/SILENCE; when the obligation was created, the AAA was a
>> contest, and obligations don't automagically stop existing because
>> they wouldn't if they were calculated now.
>
> I appeal the ju
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> 2009/3/10 Ed Murphy :
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2402
>>
>> = Criminal Case 2402 =
>>
>> Taral violated R2234, a power-2 rule, by not awarding me points
>>
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
>
>> 2009/3/10 Ed Murphy :
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2402
>>
>> = Criminal Case 2402 =
>>
>> Taral violated R2234, a p
2009/3/10 comex :
> For the love of god, did you actually read the arguments surrounding that
> case?
>
The arguments did not mention the relevant aspect clearly. I thought
it was a trivial case so didn't look too closely.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> 2009/3/10 Ed Murphy :
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2402
>>
>> = Criminal Case 2402 =
>>
>> Taral violated R2234, a power-2 rule, by not awarding me points
>>
7 matches
Mail list logo
