2009/3/10 comex <com...@gmail.com>: > For the love of god, did you actually read the arguments surrounding that > case? >
The arguments did not mention the relevant aspect clearly. I thought it was a trivial case so didn't look too closely.
2009/3/10 comex <com...@gmail.com>: > For the love of god, did you actually read the arguments surrounding that > case? >
The arguments did not mention the relevant aspect clearly. I thought it was a trivial case so didn't look too closely.