comex wrote:
> My mistake, I zoop a criminal case against myself alleging that I
> violated Rule 1742 by violating the P100 contract by causing P100 to
> register with the same basis as another player. (To be clear, this
> means I intend to initiate the case, then act on behalf of Sgeo and
> ehir
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arguably, everything comes back to bragging rights, the primary forms
> of which are "look at that (concept I got adopted / win I earned / scam
> I pulled off)"
Yet, perhaps, / wealth I created. Having enough assets to bribe
Goethe wrote:
> I'm not surprised, it's economic. it's just proof that people value VPs
> (or whatever they then become in the current arcane economy) more than
> points, or even wins. Nothing wrong with that, everything here
> is perceived value anyway. (I personally think the way to make w
Goethe wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, comex wrote:
>> My mistake, I zoop a criminal case against myself alleging that I
>> violated Rule 1742 by violating the P100 contract by causing P100 to
>> register with the same basis as another player. (To be clear, this
>> means I intend to initiate the ca
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:32 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A lot of the success or failure of this scam is based on the CotC's
> timing: e.g. an appeal could go through immediately while this case
> remained unassigned for nearly a week, or vice versa. So before I
> decide whether t
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, comex wrote:
> My mistake, I zoop a criminal case against myself alleging that I
> violated Rule 1742 by violating the P100 contract by causing P100 to
> register with the same basis as another player. (To be clear, this
> means I intend to initiate the case, then act on beha
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, comex wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> E.g. it's possible to "win" by
>> constant badgering trivial contests, CFJs, etc. that you call until
>> everyone just gets bored enough to let you "have it."
>
> Still surprised that the
comex wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As Defendant comex pleaded guilty, I trivially find GUILTY. Given that a
>> similar CFJ could be entered with respect to each of P2 through P99, I
>> impose a sentence of CHOKEY for 120 days.
>
> I ini
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> E.g. it's possible to "win" by
> constant badgering trivial contests, CFJs, etc. that you call until
> everyone just gets bored enough to let you "have it."
Still surprised that the Points for Me proposals actually passed.
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, comex wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Fairly ironic given eir recent complaint that players
>> blatantly ignore their punishments (not that the appeal in itself would
>> be wrong to do--it's eir right to appeal).
>
> Metagami
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> On Nov 25, 2008, at 6:46 PM, comex wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> As Defendant comex pleaded guilty, I trivially find GUILTY. Given that a
>>> similar CFJ could be entered with respect to eac
On Nov 25, 2008, at 6:46 PM, comex wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Benjamin Schultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As Defendant comex pleaded guilty, I trivially find GUILTY. Given
that a
similar CFJ could be entered with respect to each of P2 through
P99, I
impose a sentence of CHOKE
12 matches
Mail list logo
