Goethe wrote: > On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, comex wrote: >> My mistake, I zoop a criminal case against myself alleging that I >> violated Rule 1742 by violating the P100 contract by causing P100 to >> register with the same basis as another player. (To be clear, this >> means I intend to initiate the case, then act on behalf of Sgeo and >> ehird, in order, to support it, then initiate the case with 2 >> support.) > > A lot of the success or failure of this scam is based on the CotC's > timing: e.g. an appeal could go through immediately while this case > remained unassigned for nearly a week, or vice versa. So before I > decide whether to "fight" this, CotC Murphy, your opinion?
No comment.
