On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, comex wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Followup: The old Rule 1527 has been repealed. Nothing has explicitly
>> replaced it and so the Rules are silent on how to deal with those
>> situations now. It is perfectly in keepi
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Followup: The old Rule 1527 has been repealed. Nothing has explicitly
> replaced it and so the Rules are silent on how to deal with those
> situations now. It is perfectly in keeping with custom and precedent,
> then, to
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> Maybe I'm misreading this, but it seems to me that the context of the
> process of making a statement contained in a message is the
> publication of that entire message. While the ordering of actions
> announced in a message can be significant, we shou
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> While
> I'm not sure a phrase like "simultaneous but ordered" makes sense,
> it's one I might use in this situation.
Simultaneous but ordered makes perfect sense, but that breaks
when a later message goes back and modifies a previous one ("the
preced
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whups, I was too late! This nullifies Zefram's arguments in 2087,
> dunno what to do with that now. -Goethe
Zefram: "For the record, I am dubious about this interpretation of a statement
being made, and action being taken
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> == CFJ 2133 ==
>>
>>". The previous sentence is false." results in
>> being performed.
>
> I judge FALSE. CFJ 1
6 matches
Mail list logo
