Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 1882 judged TRUE by woggle

2008-02-06 Thread Ed Murphy
Zefram wrote: This should be noted as one of the perils of automation. This is part of why I favour each officer developing eir own automation. Just so long as no one tells this guy about Agora: http://forums.thedailywtf.com/forums/t/7593.aspx

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 1882 judged TRUE by woggle

2008-02-06 Thread Zefram
Ed Murphy wrote: >It wasn't much of an issue until the automated text started getting >posted to a-o again It didn't have much *present* impact, but it's a faulty historical record. Of course, once you consented to be CotC, you knew of the likelihood that it would regain its contemporaneous releva

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 1882 judged TRUE by woggle

2008-02-05 Thread comex
On Feb 5, 2008 8:27 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > This is getting tiresome. > I object. That quote is from Zefram, not Murphy. Ahaha... it was just a quote whose original message I was too lazy to go back to. Now I realize how my selective quoting could be misinterpreted.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 1882 judged TRUE by woggle

2008-02-05 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Feb 5, 2008 4:38 PM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> woggle's new argument is reasonably complete and logically coherent. >> However, I believe it displays poor judgement regarding the use of the >> English language, inasmuch as it does not accept th

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 1882 judged TRUE by woggle

2008-02-05 Thread Ian Kelly
On Feb 5, 2008 4:38 PM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > woggle's new argument is reasonably complete and logically coherent. > However, I believe it displays poor judgement regarding the use of the > English language, inasmuch as it does not accept the modifying clause in > question as modifyin