On Feb 5, 2008 4:38 PM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > woggle's new argument is reasonably complete and logically coherent. > However, I believe it displays poor judgement regarding the use of the > English language, inasmuch as it does not accept the modifying clause in > question as modifying the verb in the manner that was obviously intended. > For this reason, I intend with 2 support to appeal this judgement. > I believe that this problem cannot be rectified by remanding again, > and so I recommend that the appeal judge reassign the case.
It wasn't "obviously" intended as a request to be listed as a watcher. When I first saw it, I thought that it was just a snarky way of attempting registration. -root
