On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 20:39 +, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-11-01 at 20:14 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > I call for judgement on the following statement:
> >All non-public pledges that existed at the time of passage
> >of Proposal 5817 are null and void (i.e. no longer exist).
> As
On Sat, 2008-11-01 at 20:14 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I call for judgement on the following statement:
>All non-public pledges that existed at the time of passage
>of Proposal 5817 are null and void (i.e. no longer exist).
As Notary, I've been acting as if this were TRUE, although I have
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:15 AM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Nobody makes private pledges anyway.
>
> I've made private pledges and the Notary can confirm this.
It's quite likely that I've made more private pled
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:15 AM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nobody makes private pledges anyway.
I've made private pledges and the Notary can confirm this.
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008, 0x44 wrote:
> Warrigal wrote:
>> Nobody makes private pledges anyway.
>>
>>
> Says you.
Well, it passed on a 2-1 vote so that's democracy for you. -G.
On 2 Nov 2008, at 15:59, 0x44 wrote:
Says you.
--Warrigal, Hypocrite of Escher
--
ehird
Warrigal wrote:
Nobody makes private pledges anyway.
--Warrigal, Hypocrite of Escher
Says you.
--
--
0x44;
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, 1 Nov 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 10:11 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Note that, contrary to the title of Propos
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Nov 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 10:11 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Note that, contrary to the title of Proposal 5817, private pledges are
>>> not pointless, because many pledges consi
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 10:11 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I call for judgement on the following statement:
>>> All non-public pledges that existed at the time of passage
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 10:11 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I call for judgement on the following statement:
>> All non-public pledges that existed at the time of passage
>> of Proposal 5817 are null and void (i.
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I call for judgement on the following statement:
> All non-public pledges that existed at the time of passage
> of Proposal 5817 are null and void (i.e. no longer exist).
Note that, contrary to the title of Proposal 5817
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Nov 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Proposal 5817 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=1) by Murphy
>> Private pledges are pointless
>>
>> Amend Rule 2191 (Pledges) by replacing "A pledge is a contract"
>> with "A pledge is a pub
13 matches
Mail list logo
