Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
you're standing, then you must wait till you're assigned something
(switching you to sitting) before opting out of further judicial work.
Sounds unwise. I think one should be able to opt out at any time.
The concept of a "standing court" suggests an explici
Ed Murphy wrote:
>you're standing, then you must wait till you're assigned something
>(switching you to sitting) before opting out of further judicial work.
Sounds unwise. I think one should be able to opt out at any time.
But one should also not be able to go from opted-out to standing if
one wa
Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
A player may change emself from sitting or lying down, or vice
versa, by announcement.
s/,/ to standing,/
No, actually I meant "from sitting to lying down, or vice versa". If
you're standing, then you must wait till you're assigned something
(switch
Ed Murphy wrote:
> A player may change emself from sitting or lying down, or vice
> versa, by announcement.
s/,/ to standing,/
>[What should be done with precedents, besides what Rule 217 does?]
I'd like to formalise case law further. I suggest that we wait to see
what Goethe's resear
4 matches
Mail list logo
