On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:08 AM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Did that get removed? The last version of the ruleset I've seen
>> (http://www.geoffreyspear.com/slr.txt) still has it.
>
> Hm. I guess you're right because P5669 was ineffective due to the text
> replaced not matching t
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did that get removed? The last version of the ruleset I've seen
> (http://www.geoffreyspear.com/slr.txt) still has it.
That page is now out of date, but I don't remember a proposal changing
REASSIGN since it was updated.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 20:50, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> woggle wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 19:09, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Proto-Proposal: Community service
>>> (AI = 1.7, please)
>>>
>>> Amend Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) by appending this text between the
>>>
woggle wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 19:09, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Proto-Proposal: Community service
>> (AI = 1.7, please)
>>
>> Amend Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) by appending this text between the
>> sections on FINE and CHOKEY:
>>
>> * COMMUNITY SERVICE with a set of up
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 19:09, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Proto-Proposal: Community service
> (AI = 1.7, please)
>
> Amend Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) by appending this text between the
> sections on FINE and CHOKEY:
>
> * COMMUNITY SERVICE with a set of up to five tasks (the presc
5 matches
Mail list logo