On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:08 AM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Did that get removed? The last version of the ruleset I've seen >> (http://www.geoffreyspear.com/slr.txt) still has it. > > Hm. I guess you're right because P5669 was ineffective due to the text > replaced not matching the actual text -- which means that comex's > http://cfj.qoid.us/current_flr.txt is wrong (and, incidentally, the > annotation also has the wrong proposal number).
Which also just stopped working because of really dumb billing issues. In a few days I'll be back from vacation, get that back up, fix that error, and publish the ruleset proper. Hopefully when there's only one set of voting results to go through, I'll be more careful.
