On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 16:39 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Proto-Proposal: Close the partnership loophole
> (AI = 2, please)
>
> [Please let me know if this would conflict with the Rests proto, in
> which case one or the other of us can work out conditional merges.]
No conflict. It would end up creati
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 8:04 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Proto-Proposal: Close the partnership loophole
>> (AI = 2, please)
>
> By CFJ 1938, an appropriate equation only fixes an inequity between
> the partners, not
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Proto-Proposal: Close the partnership loophole
> (AI = 2, please)
By CFJ 1938, an appropriate equation only fixes an inequity between
the partners, not between the partners and the rest of the game. It
would be much better to
3 matches
Mail list logo
