On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 16:39 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > Proto-Proposal: Close the partnership loophole > (AI = 2, please) > > [Please let me know if this would conflict with the Rests proto, in > which case one or the other of us can work out conditional merges.] No conflict. It would end up creating two different ways to punish players for failing to rail in unruly partnerships (either punish the players for violating the partnership [your proto], or punish the partnership and have the penalty devolve onto the players [my proto]), which is arguably a good thing. -- ais523
