Goethe wrote:
> Remind me again... why exactly is having any person (as opposed to the
> responsible officer) a Feature?
So that ratification works even if we're collectively mistaken about the
holder of the office in question.
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-12-26 at 10:33 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> Amend Rule 2202 (Ratification Without Objection), adding at the end:
>>>
>>> Ratification Without Objection CANNOT cause the repeal, amendment,
>>> enact
Wooble wrote:
> and WHEREAS requiring ratification by proposal of the Rules should be
> expected to lead to a more careful examination of the ratified text,
"and WHEREAS requiring the Rules to be ratified by proposal" etc.
On Fri, 2008-12-26 at 10:33 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> > Amend Rule 2202 (Ratification Without Objection), adding at the end:
> >
> > Ratification Without Objection CANNOT cause the repeal, amendment,
> > enactment, or mutation of any Rule, rules to the
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> Amend Rule 2202 (Ratification Without Objection), adding at the end:
>
> Ratification Without Objection CANNOT cause the repeal, amendment,
> enactment, or mutation of any Rule, rules to the contrary
> notwithstanding.
> }}
We used to exclude the rules
5 matches
Mail list logo
