On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, Alex Smith wrote: > On Fri, 2008-12-26 at 10:33 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >>> Amend Rule 2202 (Ratification Without Objection), adding at the end: >>> >>> Ratification Without Objection CANNOT cause the repeal, amendment, >>> enactment, or mutation of any Rule, rules to the contrary >>> notwithstanding. >>> }} >> >> We used to exclude the ruleset from ratification and I think it's >> a Very Good Idea. > > Agreed, although a player in position to run a ratification scam could > ratify a fake Assessor's + Promotor's report to force through a proposal > with only 1 second left in its voting period with everyone voting for > it, for instance.
Remind me again... why exactly is having any person (as opposed to the responsible officer) a Feature? -Goethe
