On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> What’s the protocol here? Resubmit with (A) a fixed Subject: header and (B)
> AI=3?
Don't worry about subject header; just retract and then propose anew
(can have the same name, but a courtesy is to add a "v2" or similar
for clarity).
For everyone
On Thu, 2016-09-15 at 00:59 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> Re-reading rule 106 suggests that the power of the proposed or
> amended rule is the minimum AI for the proposal, is this the only
> condition I missed last time around?
You're missing rule 2140, which is really the heart of the Power
syste
On Sep 15, 2016, at 12:07 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> ---
>
> Title: FOR Require Intent on Ballots
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: o
> Co-author(s):
I retract this proposal.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenP
> On Sep 15, 2016, at 12:50 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>> Title: FOR Require Intent on Ballots
>> Adoption index: 1.0
>> Author: o
>> Co-author(s):
>>
>> Replace the text of rule 683 'Voting on Agoran Decisions' with:
>
> Rule 683 is power-3, so this n
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> Title: FOR Require Intent on Ballots
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: o
> Co-author(s):
>
> Replace the text of rule 683 'Voting on Agoran Decisions' with:
Rule 683 is power-3, so this needs an adoption index of 3 to work.
5 matches
Mail list logo
