> On Sep 15, 2016, at 12:50 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>> Title: FOR Require Intent on Ballots
>> Adoption index: 1.0
>> Author: o
>> Co-author(s):
>> 
>> Replace the text of rule 683 'Voting on Agoran Decisions' with:
> 
> Rule 683 is power-3, so this needs an adoption index of 3 to work.

Dang. I spent some quality time grepping for ‘Adoption’ and ‘AI’ in the current 
FLS before hitting send, too. So, about that concordance…

What’s the protocol here? Resubmit with (A) a fixed Subject: header and (B) 
AI=3?

Re-reading rule 106 suggests that the power of the proposed or amended rule is 
the minimum AI for the proposal, is this the only condition I missed last time 
around?

-o

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to