On Fri, 11 Oct 2013, omd wrote:
> Proposal: Sequester (AI=3)
Technical concern: If you repeal R105 towards the beginning, does that
prevent everything that comes after it from working? Might need to
think about implementation order here.
Also, do you happen to have created a copy of what th
On Fri, 11/10/13, omd wrote:
> [This is certain to be controversial, but what the hell...
> Intentionally removes a lot of (most) important
> functionality, in the
> hope that starting from scratch may provide interest.
Could you post a copy of the resulting ruleset, so that we
can check it for
2 matches
Mail list logo
