Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Fix OVERLOOKED

2008-10-10 Thread Ed Murphy
Sgeo wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Proposal: Fix OVERLOOKED >>> (AI = 1.7, please) >>> >>> Ivan Hope and Pavitra are co-authors of this proposal. >>> >>> Amend Rule 1504 (Crimi

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Fix OVERLOOKED

2008-10-10 Thread Sgeo
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Proposal: Fix OVERLOOKED >> (AI = 1.7, please) >> >> Ivan Hope and Pavitra are co-authors of this proposal. >> >> Amend Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) by replacin

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Fix OVERLOOKED

2008-10-10 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wasn't there a proposal to fix this a while ago? What happened to it? P5612. It failed with a VI of 0.4, possibly because it redefined INNOCENT instead of just fixing the "allegedly" bit of OVERLOOKED.

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Fix OVERLOOKED

2008-10-10 Thread Sgeo
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Proposal: Fix OVERLOOKED > (AI = 1.7, please) > > Ivan Hope and Pavitra are co-authors of this proposal. > > Amend Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) by replacing this text: > > * OVERLOOKED, appropriate if the alleged act allege

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Fix OVERLOOKED

2008-05-16 Thread comex
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Amend Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) by replacing this text: > > * OVERLOOKED, appropriate if the alleged act allegedly occurred >at least 200 days before the case was initiated > > with this text: > > * OVERLOOKE

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Fix OVERLOOKED

2008-05-16 Thread comex
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't like this. The non-GUILTY options deliberately overlap as > much as possible: they're meant to not interact with each other at all. > The correct fix (if you consider the current form broken) is to clarify > that the alle

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Fix OVERLOOKED

2008-05-16 Thread Zefram
Ed Murphy wrote: > * OVERLOOKED, appropriate if the alleged act occurred at least >200 days before the case was initiated > >[If it didn't occur at all, then INNOCENT is appropriate.] I don't like this. The non-GUILTY options deliberately overlap as much as possible: they're meant to

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Fix OVERLOOKED

2008-05-16 Thread ihope
Won't this require that the alleged act actually occurred? It is fine to have non-GUILTY options overlap. --Ivan Hope CXXVII