On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't like this. The non-GUILTY options deliberately overlap as > much as possible: they're meant to not interact with each other at all. > The correct fix (if you consider the current form broken) is to clarify > that the allegation of age must be that in the indictment.
Which is the wrong solution, because then to try someone for an act e did over 200 days ago all I would have to do is not make any reference to the time at which the event occurred.