On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't like this.  The non-GUILTY options deliberately overlap as
> much as possible: they're meant to not interact with each other at all.
> The correct fix (if you consider the current form broken) is to clarify
> that the allegation of age must be that in the indictment.

Which is the wrong solution, because then to try someone for an act e
did over 200 days ago all I would have to do is not make any reference
to the time at which the event occurred.

Reply via email to